Mark: So this is the label we’re giving to the technology that we’re introducing in this release to deliver performance improvements and establish a path for scaling up for accessing massive databases while we’re providing service to a large number of simultaneous users, and Cassie’s going to add a little more description to this for you.
Cassie: Thanks Mark. Traditionally, our software has always defaulted to accessing your operational data sources directly. We really espoused the idea of traditional BI, where you’re required to build a data warehouse. The only problem with that, and it only comes up some of the time, is that operational data sources tend to be attuned more for data entry and writing.
For instance, a CRM system where information is added into the system. So they’re not performance oriented as much for reporting or the reading of that data especially for analysis - interactive analysis and visualization of that data.
#1 Ranking: Read how InetSoft was rated #1 for user adoption in G2's user survey-based index | Read More |
Some of our customers have built reporting databases where they’re simply replicating the data over. Some even go so far as building a data warehouse, although our software doesn’t require that. So, we introduced the concept of materialized views a few versions ago and with this latest release we’ve really reengineered and re-architected it all so it’s much higher performance.
The core of it is based on techniques from column based databases or data stores that are much more efficient for interactive analysis of large amount of data and if you have really large volume of data we’ve also built in distributed technology that’s largely based on the map reduce concept where we can parallelize a lot of calculations on extremely large data sets making use of a cluster or private cloud of commodity hardware instead of forcing you to invest in a very large, high performing machine.
So with those two technologies, the new data grid cache feature really extends this embedded materialized view concept even further and turns the whole process of data warehouse development on its head; where you would first build out the reports in viewsheets and then analyze the contents of the viewsheet to see how you’re using the data, now we can build an appropriate column based data store that will make that particular dashboard very high performing.
MapReduce is a powerful programming model and processing technique that enables large-scale data processing across distributed systems. Originally developed by Google, it has become a cornerstone of big data management, particularly in environments where vast amounts of data must be processed efficiently. In the realm of data management, MapReduce offers a robust framework for processing and generating large datasets by leveraging parallel computing. This article delves into the mechanics of MapReduce, its role in data management, and how it has transformed the way organizations handle and analyze big data.
MapReduce is fundamentally based on two key functions: Map and Reduce. These functions work together to process large datasets in a distributed manner. The Map function is responsible for breaking down a large task into smaller, manageable sub-tasks, while the Reduce function aggregates the results of these sub-tasks to produce a final output.
In the realm of data management, MapReduce is particularly valuable for handling massive datasets that are too large to be processed on a single machine. By distributing the processing workload across a cluster of machines, MapReduce allows organizations to efficiently manage and analyze big data. Several key aspects of data management are significantly enhanced by MapReduce:
MapReduce has been widely adopted across various industries for its ability to process large datasets efficiently. Here are a few real-world applications where MapReduce has made a significant impact:
While MapReduce is a powerful tool for data management, it is not without its challenges. One of the primary limitations of MapReduce is its complexity. Writing MapReduce programs requires a good understanding of distributed computing and the specific syntax of the framework being used, such as Hadoop's implementation of MapReduce. This learning curve can be a barrier for organizations without the necessary technical expertise.
Another challenge is that MapReduce is not always the most efficient solution for all types of data processing tasks. For example, iterative processing tasks, where the output of one stage is fed back into the system as input for another stage, can be inefficient in a MapReduce framework. In such cases, other processing models like Apache Spark, which supports in-memory processing, might be more suitable.
Lastly, while MapReduce is highly scalable, it can be resource-intensive. Running large MapReduce jobs requires significant computational resources, which can be costly. Organizations need to carefully consider the cost-benefit trade-off when deciding whether to use MapReduce for a particular task.
Previous: BI for ERP Applications |