Below is more from Information Management’s Webcast by DM Radio, “The Last Mile: Data Visualization in a Mashed-Up”. This Webcast was hosted by Eric Kavanagh and included BI consultants William Laurent and Malcolm Chisholm, and InetSoft's Product Manager Tibby Xu.
Eric Kavanagh (EK): I am glad you brought in that concept of semantics. Let’s drill into that very quickly because it seems to me in the ideal world, we’re just going to dream here, the ideal information architecture, it seems to me that you would have some kind of a semantic marshalling area to help manage your meta data, right?
William Laurent (WL): Maybe or maybe not. The point I was making is that, again, not to keep dwelling on just geographic underliers, but people look at something and they know what it is. They know this a street, this is a house, this is a church, this is a park. So that information by default, you’re able to get that information without a lot of heavy lifting, or get that semantic consistency and meaning without heavy lifting in data governance processes, that sort of thing because you’re representing it visually. That’s the point.
#1 Ranking: Read how InetSoft was rated #1 for user adoption in G2's user survey-based index | Read More |
EK: Malcolm, let’s bring you in here as well. What do you think of our ideal scenario?
Malcolm Chisholm (MC): Well, I think I would go a little further actually. One of the things I have been wrestling with is taking what Bill said about GIS, being the most common application where geography is the fixed frame of reference. But even in financial services or even doing data administration, data governance, for instance, we need to go further so we need to do something about developing a fundamental canvas for a mashup. For instance, I’ve been doing some data discovery work recently, and I’d love to be able to set that into some kind of mashup, but I need something that visualizes the production data landscape. Maybe it could be by subject area, I don’t know.
I think you have to move beyond GIS. The thing about geographic mapping is that we’re all familiar with it. We all know what it is. There isn’t a semantic challenge to understanding it. But let’s say if I was to create the data topography of the production landscape. Then I am going to have to create some kind of canvas and communicate to people in a fairly clear way what that is. Subject area is probably a good way to go. Then I can start to go overlay things on it like applications, servers, databases, flows of data, whatever. I think a big challenge in that, however, I think that is probably something that is going to be met. I think that there is tremendous demand for it.
![]() |
Read the top 10 reasons for selecting InetSoft as your BI partner. |
EK: Tibby, can you tell us about a case study of a company using data mashup and geographic mapping?
In the competitive landscape of ride-sharing services, companies are constantly seeking innovative ways to enhance operational efficiency, optimize routes, and improve the overall customer experience. One leading ride-sharing service (we will refer to as "RideShare Co.") faced challenges typical to the industry, such as managing vast amounts of real-time data, ensuring accurate and efficient route planning, and providing timely services in congested urban areas. To address these challenges, RideShare Co. turned to data mashup techniques combined with geographic mapping, enabling them to integrate multiple data sources and visualize insights in a manner that significantly improved decision-making processes and operational outcomes.
RideShare Co. operates in several major cities around the world, offering a platform that connects passengers with drivers via a mobile app. The company's operations are heavily reliant on data—ranging from real-time traffic information and weather conditions to customer demand patterns and driver availability. However, managing and making sense of this data in real-time posed significant challenges. The data was scattered across different systems and formats, making it difficult to gain a comprehensive view of the operational landscape. Moreover, the dynamic nature of urban traffic, coupled with unpredictable customer behavior, required a solution that could not only aggregate but also analyze and visualize data on the fly.
The primary challenges faced by RideShare Co. included:
Data Integration: The company needed to combine data from various sources, such as GPS data, traffic reports, weather forecasts, customer feedback, and driver availability, into a single coherent platform. This data was often stored in disparate systems, making it difficult to perform real-time analysis.
Real-Time Route Optimization: Efficient routing is critical in the ride-sharing industry, where minimizing wait times and travel durations can significantly impact customer satisfaction and operational costs. However, the dynamic nature of urban traffic, coupled with changing weather conditions, made it challenging to optimize routes in real time.
Demand Prediction: Understanding and predicting customer demand in different locations at different times was essential for deploying drivers effectively. However, the variability in demand due to factors like weather, events, and even socio-economic conditions made it difficult to predict with accuracy.
Enhanced Customer Experience: Providing accurate ETAs, reducing wait times, and offering personalized experiences were key to retaining customers in a highly competitive market. Achieving these goals required a deep understanding of customer behavior and preferences, which in turn relied on effective data analysis and visualization.
To overcome these challenges, RideShare Co. implemented a data mashup solution that integrated data from multiple sources into a unified platform. This platform was enhanced with geographic mapping capabilities, enabling the company to visualize data in a spatial context, which is crucial for operations based on geographic location.
Previous: Data Mashups vs. Data Warehouses |
Next: How Data Mashups Work
|