IFrame Integration

The simplest way to integrate reports with a third party web application is to present the reports inside an IFrame. A report embedded in an IFrame can be freely viewed and manipulated, even when the report engine runs in a separate container. This eliminates the need for a proxy.

Read how InetSoft saves money and resources with deployment flexibility.

The basic syntax for integrating an individual report into an IFrame is shown below, where ReportName is the name of the desired report, and remotehost is the remote server name:

<iframe src="http://remotehost:8080/sree/
    Reports?op=frameReplet&name=ReportName&outtype=REPORT"> 
<p>Text for obsolete browsers.</p> 
</iframe>

Similarly, a viewsheet can also be loaded in an IFrame via a simple URL.

<iframe src="http://remotehost:8080/sree/
    Reports?op=vs&path=/ViewsheetName">
 <p>Text for obsolete browsers.</p>
 </iframe>

The path should start with the username for a user scope viewsheet. Also, an identifier parameter can be provided in place of path, and an edit=true parameter can be used to load the viewsheet in the Visual Composer.

Pros and Cons of Using IFrames for Integration Generally

Pros:

1. Easy to Implement: IFrames are straightforward to use, requiring minimal setup. You can embed content from external sources (like a website or app) into another page using just a few lines of HTML. This simplicity makes IFrames an attractive option for developers who need quick integrations.

2. Cross-Domain Content Embedding: IFrames allow you to embed content from other domains without facing the same-origin policy restrictions that often complicate integrations across different websites or services. This makes it a common tool for embedding third-party services, like YouTube videos or widgets, onto a website.

3. Isolated Environment: Content inside an IFrame is sandboxed from the parent page, which can enhance security. This isolation means that code in the IFrame cannot directly interfere with the parent page's code, reducing the risk of introducing bugs or security vulnerabilities.

4. Independent Styling and Functionality: Since the content inside an IFrame is a separate document, it comes with its own styles and JavaScript. This independence prevents CSS or JavaScript conflicts between the embedded content and the parent website, which can be a significant advantage in complex integrations.

5. Third-Party Service Integration: IFrames are often used to integrate third-party services, such as payment gateways, social media widgets, or content syndication platforms. They provide a quick way to embed such services without needing to deeply integrate their API or modify backend code.

6. Asynchronous Loading: IFrames load independently from the rest of the parent page, which means that if the content inside the IFrame is slow to load, it will not block the main page from rendering. This can improve overall user experience by preventing delays in loading times.

Cons:

1. Performance Issues: IFrames can slow down page load times, especially if the embedded content is hosted on a slow server or contains large amounts of media. They can also cause multiple HTTP requests, contributing to performance bottlenecks.

2. Responsiveness Challenges: IFrames often do not resize dynamically to fit various screen sizes, especially on mobile devices. Without additional coding or CSS adjustments, content inside the IFrame may not display well on smaller screens, leading to a poor user experience.

3. Limited Interaction Between IFrame and Parent Page: While the sandboxing provides security, it also limits the interaction between the IFrame and the parent page. If deep integration between the IFrame and the parent is needed (for example, sharing state or events), developers have to rely on mechanisms like postMessage(), which can be complex and difficult to maintain.

4. SEO Implications: Search engines do not index the content within IFrames as effectively as content that is directly embedded into a page. This can negatively impact the SEO ranking of a website if important content is housed inside IFrames.

5. Security Vulnerabilities: Though IFrames provide isolation, they can still introduce security risks. Cross-site scripting (XSS) and clickjacking attacks can exploit vulnerabilities if proper sandboxing attributes or security measures are not applied to the IFrame.

6. User Experience Issues: Content in IFrames may not match the look and feel of the parent website, leading to a disjointed user experience. This can be particularly jarring if users are not aware they're interacting with embedded content from a different source.

Pros and Cons of Using IFrames Specifically for Embedding Dashboards

Embedding dashboards via IFrames brings unique challenges and advantages that go beyond general use cases, as dashboards often have specific requirements for interactivity, responsiveness, and security.

Pros:

1. Simplifies Dashboard Integration: For organizations using third-party dashboard platforms, IFrames make it easy to embed these visualizations into existing systems or web applications without having to rebuild the dashboard from scratch. This simplicity can save time and resources.

2. Cross-Platform and Multi-Tool Support: IFrames can embed dashboards from different analytics platforms or tools (e.g., Tableau, Power BI, or InetSoft) without worrying about API compatibility or complex backend integrations. This flexibility allows organizations to centralize data visualizations from multiple sources.

3. Maintains Consistency Across Applications: When a dashboard provider updates or changes the embedded dashboard, the parent system automatically reflects those updates without needing to modify code on the parent page. This ensures that the dashboards stay current without manual intervention.

4. Reduces Development Overhead: If an organization is leveraging third-party dashboards, embedding them via IFrame eliminates the need to handle the complexities of building, hosting, or managing the dashboard itself. This can be especially beneficial for teams that lack the resources to develop custom dashboards.

5. Isolates Dashboard Functionality: Because IFrames operate independently, the dashboard's styles, scripts, and behavior remain separate from the parent page. This isolation helps prevent conflicts that could arise from integrating complex visualization libraries with the host application's existing code.

Cons:

1. Interactivity Limitations: Many dashboards are interactive, allowing users to filter data, drill down into reports, or manipulate visualizations. Embedding dashboards via IFrames can limit the ability to capture or react to these interactions in the parent application. If advanced interaction between the dashboard and the host page is required, this becomes a challenge.

2. Responsiveness Issues: Dashboards often need to be highly responsive, adapting to different screen sizes or devices. However, IFrames don't natively adjust their size based on the content within them, which can cause display issues, especially on mobile devices. Developers may need to apply custom CSS or JavaScript to resize IFrames, adding complexity.

3. Limited Customization: If an organization needs to customize the appearance or functionality of the dashboard to better align with their branding or specific needs, IFrames offer limited options. Styling changes usually need to be made within the dashboard platform itself, and may not always be possible through the parent page.

4. Data Sharing Restrictions: Dashboards often display sensitive data, and embedding them via IFrames can introduce data security risks if proper security measures (such as encryption and access control) are not in place. The IFrame's isolation can also make it harder to share data between the dashboard and other parts of the parent system.

5. Performance Concerns for Complex Dashboards: Dashboards that process or visualize large datasets can be resource-intensive. If multiple dashboards are embedded via IFrames on a single page, they can slow down the parent page's overall performance, leading to sluggish user experiences.

6. Authentication and Access Control: Many dashboards require authentication to view data. Embedding dashboards via IFrames can complicate the authentication process, particularly when Single Sign-On (SSO) or token-based authentication is required. Developers may need to implement additional mechanisms (such as OAuth or API tokens) to ensure secure access.

7. Embedding Restrictions: Some dashboard platforms or services may restrict or limit the ability to embed dashboards using IFrames due to security concerns or licensing terms. If the platform does not allow embedding via IFrame or places limitations on data access, it can reduce the feasibility of this integration method.

8. Maintenance Overhead for External Dashboards: If the embedded dashboard is hosted externally (e.g., a third-party platform), any downtime or performance issues on that platform can affect the availability and functionality of the embedded content. The parent site is dependent on the external service's uptime, adding potential maintenance concerns.